inverted V vs straight dipole for 40m — actually worth the difference?
- Replies 1
- Views 87
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Dave Thompson 1 post
-
Patricia Davis 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running an inverted V for 40m for a couple years now, apex at about 35 feet with the ends dropping down to maybe 8 feet off the ground on each side. works ok but i keep reading that a flat top dipole at the same apex height would outperform it, especially at lower takeoff angles for dx. my problem is i only have the one tall support (a pine tree roughly in the middle of the yard) so a flat top would mean the ends are also at 35 feet which means i need two more supports at the far ends of the lot.
anyone actually done a side by side comparison or modeled both configs? i ran it through mmana-gal once and the flat top showed better gain at low angles but honestly i wasnt sure i set up the inverted V geometry right in the model. the ground constants i used were probably wrong too.
also my lot is kind of irregular shaped so one end of the dipole would be closer to the house foundation than id like. not sure how much that matters at 40m wavelengths. anyway curious what people have actually experienced not just what the modeling says
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/3664-inverted-v-vs-straight-dipole-for-40m-actually-worth-the-difference/Share on other sites