JS8Call vs FT8 for actual two-way conversations — worth the hassle?
- Replies 1
- Views 58
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Gary Mitchell 1 post
-
Amanda Williams49 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and yeah its great for racking up contacts and working new entities but honestly it feels more like a video game than radio sometimes. you click a callsign, the software does everything, you log a contact with someone you never actually talked to. i dont know, maybe im being a snob about it.
anyway i stumbled onto JS8Call a few months back and the concept seemed cool — basically the FT8 weak signal magic but you can actually type back and forth with someone. been trying to get it set up properly on my IC-7300 with the built in USB audio and it mostly works but i keep seeing decode errors on my end even when the SNR looks fine. running WSJT-X for FT8 on the same setup with zero issues so its something specific to JS8Call i think. anyone else notice the decode threshold is noticeably worse than FT8? feels like i need a stronger signal to get a clean decode
also is there even enough activity on JS8Call to make it worthwhile or is it kind of a ghost town these days
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4461-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actual-twoway-conversations-worth-the-hassle/Share on other sites