JS8Call vs FT8 for actual two-way conversations — am I missing something
- Replies 1
- Views 70
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Carlos Mendez 1 post
-
Mark Thompson 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 for about two years now and i get it, its great for working new entities and all that, the weak signal stuff is genuinely impressive, i worked ZL on 40m with like 3 watts last winter which still kind of blows my mind. but theres this part of me that misses actual qsos. like i want to actually talk to somebody not just exchange grid squares and signal reports.
someone on the local repeater mentioned JS8Call and i set it up last week. its definitely slower and the bands feel quieter on it but i had a legit back and forth conversation with a guy in colorado for maybe 20 minutes yesterday and it reminded me why i got into this hobby in the first place. the SNR performance is supposed to be close to FT8 right? maybe not quite as deep in the noise but close enough for most situations.
my question is really whether theres a community there worth investing time in, or is it kind of a ghost town outside of certain hours. i was on 14.078 for a while and saw maybe 8-10 stations. compared to FT8 thats nothing but maybe thats fine if theyre actually there to chat. also does anybody run JS8Call on 40 or 80 for regional stuff, im in the midwest so those bands might be more useful for me than 20m
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4592-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actual-twoway-conversations-am-i-missing-something/Share on other sites