JS8Call vs FT8 for actually having a conversation — am i missing something
- Replies 1
- Views 66
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Sarah Collins 1 post
-
Jessica Davis21 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and i get it, its incredible for weak signal work, i regularly work stuff ive got no business working with 10 watts into a compromised antenna. but its not really a conversation is it. you exchange signal reports and grid squares and thats kind of it. felt like i was playing a video game more than operating.
somebody at the club mentioned JS8Call and i installed it last weekend. i like the idea, its basically built on the same WSJT-X engine as FT8 but the sequences are longer and you can actually type messages back and forth. the latency is brutal though, like youre waiting 15 seconds between each exchange and by the time you get a reply the band has shifted and the signal is half gone. maybe thats just the nature of operating that close to the noise floor i dunno.
PSK31 i used to run a lot on 20m and honestly that felt more like a real QSO, you could type in real time basically and the decoding was pretty solid down to maybe -15 or so on a good day. but JS8Call is supposed to go way deeper than that right? like into the -20s?
anyway im not really asking anything specific just curious if other people use JS8Call for actual ragchewing or if its mostly used for messaging relay stuff and store-and-forward. seems like a cool concept that maybe doesnt quite deliver in practice but i could be wrong, havent given it a fair shake yet
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/5326-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actually-having-a-conversation-am-i-missing-something/Share on other sites