dipole vs vertical for 40m — am i overthinking this
- Replies 1
- Views 48
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Emily Wilson 1 post
-
Linda Chen 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been going back and forth on this for like two months now and i need someone to just tell me to stop second guessing myself. i have a decent sized lot, maybe 150ft deep, and i want to get on 40m for the first time. been doing 2m/70cm stuff for a couple years but finally got my general and want to work some dx.
the question is basically dipole at 35ft vs a vertical with radials. i know 35ft isnt ideal for 40m but its what i can realistically do between two trees. i keep reading that a dipole lower than a half wavelength starts acting more like a cloud warmer which isnt what i want if im trying to work dx, but i also see people say a low dipole is still better than a crappy vertical. my ground isnt great either, pretty clay heavy which i think hurts a vertical more than a dipole? or maybe im wrong about that.
dont have budget for a beam right now and honestly my HOA would probably lose their mind anyway. just trying to figure out which way to go before i start cutting wire.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/5545-dipole-vs-vertical-for-40m-am-i-overthinking-this/Share on other sites