dipole vs vertical for 40m — is it even worth the argument
- Replies 1
- Views 50
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Ashley Anderson73 1 post
-
Linda Rodriguez 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been going back and forth on this for a few weeks now and figured id just ask here because the reddit threads are all over the place. im trying to decide between putting up a simple wire dipole for 40m or just doing a quarter wave vertical with some radials. my lot is not huge, maybe 80ft across, and i've got two trees that could support a dipole but it'd have to be kind of low, probably 25-30ft at the apex. not ideal i know.
the vertical i was thinking about is just a homebrewed thing, maybe a 33ft piece of aluminum tubing or even just wire up a fishing pole. throw down like 16-20 radials and call it a day. the thing is i work mostly dx and a few local nets and i genuinely cant figure out which way to go. everyone says verticals are good for dx because of the lower takeoff angle but then everyone also says a low dipole works just as well because it starts acting like a cloud warmer. which is actually true or does it just depend and nobody wants to say that out loud
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/5567-dipole-vs-vertical-for-40m-is-it-even-worth-the-argument/Share on other sites