JS8Call vs just running FT8 for casual ragchewing — anyone actually use it?
- Replies 1
- Views 28
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Sarah Rodriguez 1 post
-
Kimberly Brooks 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
So ive been on FT8 for a while now and yeah its great for working new entities and whatever but honestly it feels like a slot machine after a while. click click click, 73, done. no actual conversation happened. a buddy at the club mentioned JS8Call as a way to actually talk to people using weak signal stuff and im curious if anyone here actually uses it regularly or if its kind of a ghost town on the bands.
my setup is pretty basic, IC-7300 into a end-fed halfwave up about 25 feet, running WSJT-X for the FT8 stuff. i know JS8Call is a separate program, looks like it runs on similar principles to FT8 but slower and you can actually type messages back and forth. tried tuning around 14.078 a couple times in the evenings and heard some activity but wasnt sure if i was decoding it right since the software looked different than what im used to.
also curious how it compares to just using PSK31 for ragchewing, i know PSK31 has been around forever and theres still some activity on 14.070 area. seems like the older guys at the club swear by it but i dont know if the weak signal performance is anywhere close to what JS8Call can do. maybe im overthinking this and should just try both for a few weeks.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/6536-js8call-vs-just-running-ft8-for-casual-ragchewing-anyone-actually-use-it/Share on other sites