dipole vs vertical for 40m — am i overthinking this
- Replies 1
- Views 17
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Sarah Wilson93 1 post
-
John Taylor 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been going back and forth on this for probably two months now and i need someone to just talk me off the ledge or push me one way. my situation is a small suburban lot, maybe 60 feet usable in the backyard, HOA that technically says no antennas but the neighbors dont care as long as its not obvious. i currently have a trapped vertical which i put up last spring and honestly it works okay but 40m has been disappointing — like im getting out but not nearly as well as i expected based on what people say about verticals and low angle radiation and all that.
i keep reading that a dipole at even 30 or 40 feet will outperform a vertical on 40m for most practical purposes, especially if your ground isnt great. and my ground is definitely not great, i havent done any radials to speak of, just the four that came with the antenna kit. so part of me thinks im blaming the wrong thing. but the other part says a dipole at 40 feet on 40m is pretty compromised too since thats only about a third wavelength up.
anyone run both and actually done a real comparison, not just theoretical? im not trying to work dx necessarily, mostly domestic stuff, some nets, maybe the occasional contest. space is the limiting factor more than money at this point.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/6754-dipole-vs-vertical-for-40m-am-i-overthinking-this/Share on other sites