dipole vs vertical for 40m - can't decide and my yard isn't helping
- Replies 1
- Views 44
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Ashley Johnson 1 post
-
Michael Brown79 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been going back and forth on this for like three weeks now and i figured id just post here and see what people think. my situation is that i have a decent sized backyard but theres a big oak tree on one end and my neighbors fence kind of limits where i can run wire. i was originally dead set on putting up a half wave dipole for 40m because i figured simple is better, but then i started reading about verticals and now im second guessing myself.
the main thing is i mostly want to work dx, not so much local stuff. i know dipoles have that nice figure-8 pattern and if i can get it up high enough itll do well for dx, but high enough on 40m is like 65 feet minimum and my tallest support point is probably 35-40 feet off the ground using the oak. so its gonna be a drooping inverted-v situation no matter what. which is fine i guess but then i start thinking maybe a vertical with a good radial system would be better for low angle radiation anyway.
the thing is i really dont want to lay out 30+ radials. i know some guys do elevated radials and claim 4 or 8 works fine but ive heard mixed things. anyone run a 40m vertical with a minimal radial system and actually been happy with it? or am i overthinking this and the inverted-v at 38 feet is just gonna work fine?
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/7073-dipole-vs-vertical-for-40m-cant-decide-and-my-yard-isnt-helping/Share on other sites