RemoteHams vs just rolling your own remote setup - anyone done both?
- Replies 1
- Views 57
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Dave Parker 1 post
-
Jessica Williams 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running a remote station for about two years now using a pretty cobbled together setup - basically a raspberry pi running some custom scripts, a SignaLink for audio, and RigControl over VPN back to my home QTH. works fine but its a pain to maintain and every time my ISP does something weird the whole thing falls apart and i have to drive out there to reset stuff.
a buddy of mine keeps telling me to just switch to RemoteHams and be done with it, says the client software is actually pretty solid now and they've added SDR support which i didnt know about. the SDR remote piece is interesting to me because i have an SDRplay sitting around doing nothing and it would be cool to use it as a panadapter on the remote end so i can see whats going on without having to guess.
my main concern is latency and the audio codec situation. right now i have the audio tuned pretty well for SSB and CW but when i tried echolink-style internet linking a few years back the latency was always kind of annoying for actual back-and-forth QSOs. does RemoteHams handle that better or is it still kind of the same deal where you just learn to live with it
also wondering if anyone has tried linking a remote station into a local repeater setup over the internet, like using something like AllStar or IRLP on one end and the remote HF rig on the other. probably a weird use case but i was thinking about it
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/7270-remotehams-vs-just-rolling-your-own-remote-setup-anyone-done-both/Share on other sites