js8call vs ft8 for actually holding a QSO - am i missing something
- Replies 1
- Views 68
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Robert Miller 1 post
-
Emily Wilson37 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and yeah its great for getting contacts logged but it always felt kind of hollow to me, like youre not really talking to anyone just exchanging signal reports and grid squares and then its over. heard about JS8Call from a guy at my club who said it was basically FT8 but you could actually have a conversation and i set it up last weekend and honestly im not sure im using it right
the waterfall looks similar to WSJT-X and i get that the protocol is derived from FT8 but the timing seems way more flexible which is confusing me after being so used to the rigid 15 second windows. also the SNR seems to vary a lot more than im used to and im not sure if thats just because more people are on FT8 or if im doing something wrong on the JS8Call side. running an IC-7300 into a dipole up about 35 feet, nothing fancy
also genuinely curious if anyone still does PSK31 because from what i can tell the weak signal performance isnt anywhere near FT8 or JS8 but i kind of like the idea of actually typing back and forth in something close to real time. is RTTY just completely dead at this point or does it still show up in contests mostly
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/7358-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actually-holding-a-qso-am-i-missing-something/Share on other sites