JS8Call vs FT8 for actually having a conversation - worth the lower sensitivity?
- Replies 1
- Views 67
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
James Wilson48 1 post
-
Daniel Rodriguez 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 for about two years now mostly just chasing DX and filling in the log and honestly its great for that, but lately ive been feeling like its kind of... hollow? like you make the contact and thats it, there's nothing to it. heard about JS8Call from a guy at the club meeting last month and been playing with it this week and i have to say its a pretty different experience even if the signals are weaker by comparison.
the thing is im running about 50w into a end fed halfwave up about 25 feet and on 40m at night i can usually hold a keyboard QSO with guys 800-1200 miles out without much trouble, but when propagation dips even a little the decodes get spottier than FT8 would be under the same conditions. i think the sensitivity difference is something like 10dB or so? cant remember exactly. anyway the question is whether other people have found a sweet spot - like what power level and antenna situation makes JS8Call actually reliable enough to use for emcomm type stuff or even just ragchewing without it falling apart every other exchange
also been meaning to try PSK31 again, havent touched it since like 2015, wondering if theres still any activity on the usual frequencies or if everyone just moved to FT8 and called it a day
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/7597-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actually-having-a-conversation-worth-the-lower-sensitivity/Share on other sites