SO2R worth the hassle for casual contesters or is it overkill
- Replies 1
- Views 62
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Andrew Jackson 1 post
-
Kevin O'Brien 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been contesting for maybe 4 years now mostly single op on 20 and 40 and my rates are decent but i keep hitting this ceiling where i just cant squeeze more Qs out of an hour. running somewhere around 120-130/hr on a good day during something like SS or CQWW and i know guys with similar antennas doing 160+ pretty consistently.
been reading a lot about SO2R and i get the concept, radio 1 runs a freq and radio 2 is hunting mults or S&P while the other is in a pileup or whatever. but in practice it seems like there's a ton of setup overhead - station interlocks, bandpass filters, keeping the two radios from blowing each other up, N1MM configs, all of it. my current setup is an IC-7300 and a borrowed K3 i had for a while but dont have anymore so even hardware-wise im not quite there.
what i'm really wondering is whether the rate gains are actually worth it for someone who doesnt operate 48 hours straight every contest. like if im only putting in 20-24 hours does SO2R still make sense or is it more of a full-time contester thing. also curious if anyone found ways to improve rate WITHOUT going SO2R because i feel like my CQing technique and when i decide to S&P vs run is probably suboptimal and thats maybe a bigger factor than i think
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/7635-so2r-worth-the-hassle-for-casual-contesters-or-is-it-overkill/Share on other sites