40m dipole vs vertical - fed up with my current setup
- Replies 1
- Views 63
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Emily Davis22 1 post
-
Michelle Garcia 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running an inverted V dipole for 40m for about two years now, apex at maybe 35 feet off the ground with the ends drooping down to about 10 feet on each side. works ok-ish but ive always felt like something was off with the low angle radiation especially when guys on the west coast are booming in and im barely making it through the noise on their end.
been thinking about switching to a vertical, maybe a quarter wave with a decent radial field under it. i know verticals are noisy but my noise floor is already pretty bad out here (suburban lot, neighbors with solar inverters and all kinds of junk) so i dont know if itd actually be worse. the thing is i only have maybe 60-70 feet of usable space in the back yard so putting down a proper radial field is gonna be a squeeze and ill probably have to fold some of them.
has anyone actually done a side by side comparison between an inverted V and a quarter wave vertical on 40? like real world not just modeling software. because the models always make it look like the vertical wins hands down on DX paths but thats assuming a perfect ground and i definitely dont have that. just trying to figure out if its worth tearing down what i have.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/7738-40m-dipole-vs-vertical-fed-up-with-my-current-setup/Share on other sites