JS8Call vs FT8 for actually having a conversation - is it worth the hassle?
- Replies 1
- Views 20
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Robert Kim 1 post
-
Emily Moore 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and yeah its great for racking up contacts and the weak signal performance is honestly kind of insane, worked a ZL from my attic dipole last winter with like 5 watts which blew my mind. but its also kind of... soulless? every qso is the same 4 exchanges and youre done. i started poking around JS8Call because at least in theory you can actually type back and forth like a real conversation, kind of like PSK31 used to be but with the weak signal advantage of FT8s underlying engine.
anyway i set it up last weekend and the waterfall looks busy enough on 40m but i spent like two hours calling CQ and got exactly one reply, and that guy just sent me his grid and disappeared. so my question is, is JS8Call actually active enough to be worth running, or is it kind of a ghost town? also does anyone run it on 20m or 10m when that band is open, wondering if thats better than 40 for finding people who actually want to chat. im running an IC-7300 into a G5RV if that matters.
also unrelated but does anyone still do PSK31 at all? i feel like that mode just vanished overnight a few years back and i miss it honestly
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/8036-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actually-having-a-conversation-is-it-worth-the-hassle/Share on other sites