JS8Call vs FT8 for actually having a conversation - worth the hassle?
- Replies 1
- Views 18
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Patricia Davis 1 post
-
Emily Moore 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 pretty heavily for the last year or so, got my DXCC up to like 180 something and its great for that but honestly sometimes i just want to actually talk to somebody and FT8 is obviously not that. a buddy of mine kept bugging me to try JS8Call and i finally set it up last weekend and im kind of on the fence about it.
the weak signal performance is obviously still there since its built on the same WSJT-X engine basically, and ive had some decent QSOs where we actually exchanged more than a signal report and grid square, which was refreshing. but the activity level compared to FT8 is just... not even close. i was calling CQ on 40m JS8Call for like 45 minutes Sunday afternoon and got two responses, and one of those was just a relay from somebody i wasnt even trying to contact.
im wondering if anybody here has found good times or bands where JS8Call is actually busy enough to be worth monitoring. or is it just kind of a niche thing that never quite took off. i keep PSK31 on 20m sometimes too and honestly sometimes that feels more active than JS8Call. also considered going back to RTTY contesting more seriously since at least during a contest theres actually people to work.
not trying to be negative about it, genuinely curious if im missing something about how people use it
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/8100-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actually-having-a-conversation-worth-the-hassle/Share on other sites