JS8Call vs FT8 for actually having a conversation - worth the hassle?
- Replies 1
- Views 24
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Amanda Wilson 1 post
-
Patricia Nakamura 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and yeah its great for working new entities and the weak signal stuff is genuinely impressive, managed to work into japan last week running maybe 10 watts into a compromised attic dipole which i never would have pulled off on SSB. but honestly it feels like logging software at this point, you click, it exchanges signal reports, you log it, next QSO. theres no actual conversation happening.
started poking around JS8Call because at least in theory you can type actual sentences back and forth and it still has that weak signal capability inherited from FT8's underpinnings. set it up last night and the band was pretty quiet but i did see a few stations calling CQ. my question is whether anyone actually uses this regularly or is it mostly empty. like is there a time of day or a specific frequency where people congregate because i was watching 14.078 for a while and it felt like a ghost town compared to the FT8 watering holes.
also curious if the timing sync is as strict as FT8 or if its a bit more forgiving, my laptop clock drifts sometimes and i have to keep resyncing with that internet time thing
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/8112-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actually-having-a-conversation-worth-the-hassle/Share on other sites