SO2R actually worth the headache? thinking about making the jump
- Replies 1
- Views 12
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Ham Fan 1 post
-
Steven Taylor 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been doing single op contests for a few years now, mostly on HF, done a bunch of CQWWs and SS and a few sprints here and there. my rates on a good run are decent but i keep watching the claimed scores from the top SO2R guys and theres just no comparison. like the multiplier hunting they can do while keeping a run going on the other radio is just a completely different game.
problem is i dont even know where to start. ive got a second rig (an old IC-7300 sitting on the shelf) and my main is an IC-7610, so the radio side isnt the biggest issue i guess. but the antenna situation is going to be rough because i only have a tribander and a 40m dipole and from what i understand the filtering situation between two radios on different bands gets real messy real fast if they're not well separated. ive read about the 2-radio networked setups with band decoders and the relay-switched bandpass filters but man that seems like a whole project.
is the rate improvement actually noticeable for a mid-level contestor or is this more of a thing where you need to already be at a high rate to really benefit from it? i feel like if im sitting at 80-90 qsos/hr on a good hour, adding SO2R complexity might just introduce more problems than it solves. curious what people who have actually done it think, not just the theoretical argument for it
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/8333-so2r-actually-worth-the-headache-thinking-about-making-the-jump/Share on other sites