vertical vs dipole for 40m - am i overthinking this
- Replies 1
- Views 6
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Jessica Johnson 1 post
-
Nicole Jackson 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been going back and forth on this for like three weeks now and i just need someone to tell me to stop second guessing myself. im putting up my first real HF antenna for 40m and i cant decide between a simple half wave dipole at about 30 feet or a vertical with a decent radial field. my lot is maybe 80x120 feet so space isnt terrible but the neighbors on one side are close and i was thinking a vertical might be less visible. the dipole seems like the obvious choice for simplicity but everything i read says verticals are better for DX because of the lower takeoff angle and i do want to work some DX eventually, not just ragchew on 7.250 or whatever. but then someone at the club last week said my radial field would need to be really extensive to compete with a dipole at even modest height and now im second guessing the whole vertical idea. ive got some rg8x and a pretty basic tuner. anyone actually compared these in a real backyard situation not just on paper
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/8395-vertical-vs-dipole-for-40m-am-i-overthinking-this/Share on other sites