JS8Call vs FT8 for actually having a conversation — worth the lower decode rate?
- Replies 1
- Views 94
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Emily Wilson 1 post
-
Sarah Thomas43 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and yeah its great for racking up contacts and all that but honestly it feels more like playing a video game than actually talking to anyone. you know what i mean. the whole 15 second exchange thing is fine if you just want a grid square but thats about all you're getting out of it.
anyway a buddy of mine at the club keeps going on about JS8Call and how you can actually send messages back and forth, relay stuff through other stations, even store and forward messages when someone isnt on frequency at the same time. sounds interesting but he also says the decode sensitivity isnt quite as good as FT8, which makes sense because you're sending actual text and not just a fixed format message.
my question is whether anyone has actually used both regularly and can tell me if JS8Call is worth setting up alongside WSJT-X or if its kind of a niche thing that only a handful of people are actually running. i dont want to go through all the config headaches if its basically a ghost town on the dial frequencies. running a IC-7300 into a trapped vertical on 40m mostly, sometimes 20m in the afternoon.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/1739-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actually-having-a-conversation-worth-the-lower-decode-rate/Share on other sites