JS8Call vs just running FT8 for weak signal — am i missing something
- Replies 1
- Views 96
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Mark Stevens 1 post
-
Jessica Williams 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and i get the appeal, the weak signal stuff is genuinely impressive, pulled contacts at -20dB that i never would have made on SSB. but lately ive been reading about JS8Call and people keep saying its better for actual communication vs just exchange-style contacts. i tried it for a few weeks and honestly the activity seemed way lower on the bands i checked (mostly 40m and 20m), like id see maybe 4-5 stations vs the wall of FT8 signals.
what im trying to figure out is whether its worth keeping JS8Call running alongside WSJT-X or if im just splitting attention for no real gain. i do some ARES stuff locally so the idea of a more robust weak signal chat mode is interesting but i cant tell if the activity is just low in my area or if the mode itself has kind of stalled out development wise. also does anyone run PSK31 still, i was reading old posts from like 2005 that made it sound like the best thing ever and i tried it once and the waterfall was basically empty
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/2038-js8call-vs-just-running-ft8-for-weak-signal-am-i-missing-something/Share on other sites