JS8Call vs FT8 for actual two-way conversations — am i missing something
- Replies 1
- Views 91
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Robert Kowalski 1 post
-
Daniel Rodriguez 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and i get the appeal, log contacts fast, works when the band is barely there, its great for chasing DX when you cant really hold a CW or SSB qso. but theres something that bugs me about it — its not really a conversation is it. youre basically just exchanging grid squares and signal reports and thats it. felt hollow after a while.
anyway someone on our local club net mentioned JS8Call and i set it up last weekend and honestly its a pretty different experience. still works on weak signals, not quite as deep in the noise as FT8 but close enough, and you can actually type back and forth like a slow keyboard QSO. reminds me more of the old PSK31 days where you could actually chat with someone.
my question is whether people who use JS8Call seriously are running it on 40m mostly or somewhere else. ive been hearing activity around 7.078 but its pretty sparse compared to the zoo on the FT8 frequencies. also whats the typical power people run — ive been doing 25w and getting some responses but not a ton. wondering if im just not finding where the activity is concentrated or if JS8Call just doesnt have the user base to make it worth monitoring regularly.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/2323-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actual-twoway-conversations-am-i-missing-something/Share on other sites