SO2R actually worth it for a casual contester or am I overthinking this
- Replies 1
- Views 76
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Michael O'Brien 1 post
-
Robert Mitchell 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been doing contests semi-seriously for a few years now, mostly phone but been getting more into CW lately, and every time i read the writeups from the top scorers they're always talking about SO2R and how critical it is for rate. i get the concept — run on one radio while you're searching and pouncing on the second one, or use the second radio to find a mult while you're holding a frequency on the first. makes total sense in theory.
but honestly my station is nowhere near ready for that. im running an IC-7300 into a tribander at about 45 feet and i dont really have a second antenna that could work simultaneously without blowing up the front end on radio 2. i've read about band pass filters and all that but the cost adds up fast. the question is whether the rate improvement is actually noticeable for someone doing like 500-800 QSOs in a typical CQWW weekend or if SO2R only really matters when you're pushing 2000+.
also curious if there's a middle ground — like using a second radio just for monitoring without actually transmitting on it. does that even help enough to bother with the setup hassle
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/2719-so2r-actually-worth-it-for-a-casual-contester-or-am-i-overthinking-this/Share on other sites