dipole vs vertical for 40m — is it even worth arguing about
- Replies 1
- Views 83
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Michelle Brown 1 post
-
David Anderson74 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been going back and forth on this for like two months now and i cant decide. currently running a 40m dipole up about 25 feet which i know isnt ideal, its more like an NVIS antenna at that height but its what i can do in my yard. been thinking about putting up a vertical instead, maybe a trap vertical or just a simple quarter wave with some radials.
the thing is everybodys got a different opinion. some guys at the club swear by their verticals for DX and the dipole guys say the vertical just picks up more noise. my noise floor on 40m is already pretty rough, im in a suburban neighborhood so that probably matters. i think i read somewhere that a dipole at low height actually has lower angle radiation which would be good for DX but then someone told me thats backwards. so which is it
not trying to start a war just genuinely confused and want to make a decision and stop overthinking this
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/3028-dipole-vs-vertical-for-40m-is-it-even-worth-arguing-about/Share on other sites