dipole vs vertical for 40m — which is actually worth the hassle
- Replies 1
- Views 83
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Emily Davis 1 post
-
Nicole Martin 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been going back and forth on this for a while now. currently running a 40m dipole up about 25 feet in an inverted-v config, fed with coax, and honestly it works fine but im starting to wonder if a vertical would do better especially for dx. the dipole has that figure-8 pattern which is great in two directions but theres some pretty big nulls off the ends and it happens that europe is almost exactly in one of those nulls from my QTH which is annoying.
a buddy told me a quarter wave vertical with a decent radial field would outperform my dipole for low angle radiation but i dont know if thats really true at 25 feet or if he's just been drinking the vertical kool-aid. i have space for either, backyard is maybe 80 by 60 feet so a proper radial field is doable. would probably do 16-24 radials on the ground, not buried, just laid out on the grass.
anyone actually compared these two setups side by side? not looking for theory, just what you actually observed on the air.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/3301-dipole-vs-vertical-for-40m-which-is-actually-worth-the-hassle/Share on other sites