Trap vs interlaced vs monoband yagi performance analysis
- Replies 2
- Views 185
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Steve Johnson 1 post
-
Emily Thomas17 1 post
-
David Miller 1 post
After years of using trap yagis, I'm considering upgrading to either an interlaced design or going with separate monobands. Monoband Yagis are superior to all forms of trap, linear loaded or log-periodic antennas. My current setup is a 20/15/10m trap yagi on a 40-foot tower and while it works, I'm seeing some of the typical trap antenna issues.
Hy-gain TH7dxx - 20/15/10 7ele trap Yagi - nearly useless - old-fashioned design - unreliable because of too many joints - inside the traps, steel set-screws are used with aluminium wire (and copper wire in the driven element traps), hence dis-similar metal corrosion. Poor front/back ratio.
What's the consensus on Force 12 C3 vs separate monobands? Space allows for either approach but I need to justify the cost and complexity difference.
Current performance issues: front/back ratio around 15dB (should be 20+ dB), narrow bandwidth requiring retuning between phone/CW, and trap heating at higher power levels.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/414-trap-vs-interlaced-vs-monoband-yagi-performance-analysis/Share on other sites