getting better audio on SSB — what actually makes a difference vs snake oil
- Replies 1
- Views 44
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Dave Thompson 1 post
-
Robert Kim97 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been messing around with my audio chain on SSB for a few months now and wanted to get some actual opinions from people who run SSB regularly. im running an IC-7300 and for a while i was just using the stock mic (the one that came with it, the HM-219 or whatever it is) and honestly it was fine but i kept getting reports that i sounded a little muddy or sometimes a bit hollow depending on conditions.
tried rolling off some of the bass in the TX equalizer and that helped a lot actually, like bumping the low end down a couple dB around 100-200hz made a noticeable difference in reports. but then i also started playing with the TX bandwidth setting and kept it around 2.4kHz which seems to be the sweet spot for me without killing too much presence.
my question is basically — how much of the audio improvement stuff people talk about online is actually meaningful vs just tweaking for the sake of tweaking. like does mic choice really matter THAT much on HF where the bandwidth is already limited, or am i overthinking it. also curious if anyone has strong opinions on whether speech processing actually helps or just makes you sound compressed and harsh. i run it pretty light right now, maybe 10% on the IC.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/5295-getting-better-audio-on-ssb-what-actually-makes-a-difference-vs-snake-oil/Share on other sites