JS8Call vs FT8 for actually having a conversation — worth it?
- Replies 1
- Views 36
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Tom Anderson 1 post
-
Michelle Lewis 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and honestly it works great for what it is but ive been feeling like its basically just a fancy beacon exchange at this point. you get a signal report, you confirm the qso, done. there's no actual communication happening and that started to bother me after a while.
started reading about JS8Call and it sounds like what i actually want — weak signal capability but you can type actual sentences back and forth. my question is whether the weak signal performance is anywhere close to FT8 or if youre giving up a lot to get that conversational capability. i know JS8Call has different speed modes, turbo normal slow etc, and i assume the slower ones dig deeper into the noise but i havent seen a good side by side comparison anywhere.
also wondering if theres even enough activity to bother. i pulled up the JS8Call activity on pskreporter and it looked pretty sparse compared to FT8 which is absolutely packed. running a G5RV at about 35 feet and an IC-7300 so the station isnt the issue, more just trying to figure out if its worth spinning up another software instance and hunting for activity that might not be there.
still mess around with PSK31 occasionally when i want to actually type words to someone, old habits i guess, but even that feels like it takes a lot more effort to find a qso these days than it used to.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/5556-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actually-having-a-conversation-worth-it/Share on other sites