JS8Call vs FT8 for actual two-way conversations — am i missing something
- Replies 1
- Views 39
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Michael Anderson 1 post
-
Jennifer Martinez 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and yeah its great for racking up contacts and all that but honestly after a while it feels like youre just exchanging signal reports with robots. i started poking around JS8Call last month and its a completely different animal. like you can actually type to someone and have a conversation, the latency is a bit rough but for weak signal stuff it really shines.
my question is whether anyone here regularly uses JS8Call for nets or rag chewing because i cant seem to find a lot of activity on the frequencies i've been checking. tried 14.078 a few times and heard a handful of stations but nothing like the wall of signals you get on the FT8 portion. wondering if im just on at the wrong times or if the mode never really took off the way some people hoped it would.
also for context im running an IC-7300 into a trapped vertical, pretty modest setup but FT8 works fine so the rx should be decent enough. just trying to figure out if JS8Call is worth investing more time into or if i should just accept that FT8 is what it is and move on
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/5943-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actual-twoway-conversations-am-i-missing-something/Share on other sites