JS8Call vs FT8 for actually having a QSO — am i missing something
- Replies 1
- Views 23
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Carlos Mendez 1 post
-
Michelle Garcia 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and i get the appeal, weak signal propagation is genuinely impressive and watching spots pop up on pskreporter is kind of addicting. but i keep feeling like its not really a conversation, just an exchange and done. started poking around JS8Call because i heard it was designed more for actual back and forth communication and i set it up last weekend.
my question is more about the practical side of it — like is JS8Call significantly slower for making contacts across the band or is it close to FT8 in terms of what you can work. i tried it for a few hours on 40m and heard some activity but it felt pretty sparse compared to FT8. also still not totally sure what the heartbeat thing does exactly, i read the documentation and it kind of went over my head. using a IC-7300 into a dipole up about 30 feet if that matters.
also curious if anyone still runs PSK31 regularly because i fired up fldigi and found a tiny bit of activity on 20m around 14.070 but it was pretty slow going. feels like everything migrated to FT8 and left the other modes kind of empty
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/6425-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actually-having-a-qso-am-i-missing-something/Share on other sites