inverted V vs straight dipole — actually worth the hassle to go flat?
- Replies 1
- Views 20
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Radio Geek 1 post
-
Michael Johnson 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running an inverted V for 40m for about two years now, center at maybe 35 feet with the legs sloping down to about 8 feet at the ends. works fine, gets contacts, no real complaints. but i keep reading that a flat-top dipole with the ends at the same height as the center performs noticeably better, lower takeoff angle, more gain broadside, etc. my problem is i only have one decent tall support which is a pine tree in the back yard, so getting the ends up high means either finding two more tall supports or going with a flatter slope
question is whether the real-world difference is actually worth the hassle of rigging up additional supports or if im mostly just reading about a theoretical improvement that wont matter much in practice. the inverted V pattern is more omnidirectional which i kind of like for just working around the country. curious what people who have actually tried both setups think, not just what the modeling says
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/6884-inverted-v-vs-straight-dipole-actually-worth-the-hassle-to-go-flat/Share on other sites