40m dipole vs vertical — which one actually works better for dx?
- Replies 1
- Views 6
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Ham Fan 1 post
-
Sarah Mitchell 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running a 40m dipole at about 35 feet for the last couple years and its been decent, works fine for domestic stuff, but i keep reading that verticals are supposed to be better for dx because of the lower takeoff angle. finally broke down and put up a hamstick vertical on a temporary ground mount with maybe 8 or 10 radials, nothing fancy, just wanted to see if the theory matched reality.
honestly the results are kind of mixed and i dont know what to make of them. on some evenings the vertical is clearly pulling in signals from europe that the dipole just isnt hearing, but then other times the dipole stomps all over it. like last tuesday i was working a pile-up for a JA station and the dipole was clearly the better antenna. i wonder if its just band conditions messing with my perception or if there's actually a real pattern here.
also my radial situation is probably not great. ive read you want 16 or 32 or even 60 radials buried for a real ground mounted vertical to perform right. maybe thats whats holding it back. anyone gone through this kind of comparison and figured out a rule of thumb for when to switch antennas?
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/6949-40m-dipole-vs-vertical-which-one-actually-works-better-for-dx/Share on other sites