RemoteHams vs rolling your own remote setup — anyone done both?
- Replies 1
- Views 4
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
John Williams99 1 post
-
Michelle Lewis 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running a remote station for about 8 months now, started with RemoteHams because it seemed like the easiest path to get my rig accessible from the apartment while the antenna farm stays at the QTH out in the county. works fine for the most part but ive been having this nagging feeling i could do better latency wise if i just set up my own VPN and used something like flrig or maybe SDR-Console pointing at an SDR frontend out there instead.
the RemoteHams client does what it says on the tin, audio routing is decent once you mess with the buffer settings, but the SDR remote side of things has been a bit flaky for me lately — like sometimes the waterfall just stops updating and i have to disconnect and reconnect, which is annoying mid-QSO. not sure if thats a server side thing or my ISP doing something weird.
curious if anyone has actually compared running RemoteHams with their native SDR remote capability versus just setting up an RTL-SDR or an Airspy at the remote end and tunneling it back yourself. also wondering about the internet linking side — ive got an Allstar node at the remote site and sometimes i think about just tying all this together but it gets complicated fast when youre thinking about who has control of what and when.
anyway rambling a bit here but basically asking if the DIY route is worth the headache or if RemoteHams is good enough that im just chasing ghosts
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/6976-remotehams-vs-rolling-your-own-remote-setup-anyone-done-both/Share on other sites