wire dipole vs vertical for 40m - is the difference actually that noticeable
- Replies 1
- Views 86
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Bob Williams 1 post
-
Jennifer Adams 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running a half wave dipole for 40m for about two years now, fed with coax and hung inverted-V style off a 35ft mast in the backyard. works fine, i get decent contacts, nothing to complain about really. but my neighbor just put up one of those trap verticals and he keeps talking about how much better his low angle radiation is for DX and it got me thinking.
my dipole is only about 30ft up at the apex which i know isnt ideal, honestly probably acts more like a cloud warmer at that height. ive been reading about verticals and the ground radial situation seems like a massive pain but im curious if anyone has actually done a side by side comparison at similar power levels. like real world, not antenna modeling software. im running 100w from an ic-7300 if that matters.
not really looking to tear everything down, just trying to figure out if its worth experimenting with. maybe a fan dipole at higher elevation would be a better use of my time and money than messing with radials
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/7257-wire-dipole-vs-vertical-for-40m-is-the-difference-actually-that-noticeable/Share on other sites