JS8Call vs FT8 for low power - is it even worth it?
- Replies 1
- Views 27
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Maria Rodriguez 1 post
-
Angela Turner 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now mostly on 20m and 40m, usually around 10-15 watts from an IC-7300 into a dipole in the attic. works great obviously, FT8 is basically magic at low power. but ive been reading about JS8Call lately and i guess its built on the same FT8 encoding engine but designed more for actual conversations and mesh networking stuff? i tried it a couple weekends ago and honestly i wasnt sure what i was doing half the time.
the thing that confuses me is the timing windows are more flexible compared to FT8's rigid 15 second slots, but i kept missing replies because i didnt understand the heartbeat stuff or how the relay messaging works. got a couple contacts into the midwest from here in NC but nothing that really wowed me.
i guess my question is - for weak signal work where im trying to actually communicate rather than just log a grid square, is JS8Call worth putting more time into learning? or am i better off just sticking to FT8/FT4 for the casual stuff and maybe exploring PSK31 for more conversational QSOs? i havent touched PSK31 in years honestly, used to run it back in the day with a SignaLink and it was fun but the band conditions have to be a lot better for it to work right.
also does anyone run WSPR alongside any of this for propagation checking or is that overkill
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/8166-js8call-vs-ft8-for-low-power-is-it-even-worth-it/Share on other sites