JS8Call vs FT8 for actual QSOs - am i missing something
- Replies 1
- Views 24
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
DX Hunter 1 post
-
Susan Clark 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and i get it, its great for weak signal stuff and working new entities but every contact feels kind of hollow? like you exchange signal reports and grid squares and thats it. i started poking around JS8Call last month because somebody on a local net mentioned it and honestly its kind of blowing my mind a little.
the thing is JS8Call is like 10-12dB worse than FT8 sensitivity wise which matters when youre trying to work deep into the noise but you can actually have a real conversation. typed back and forth, relay messages, store and forward stuff. its more like the old packet days but way more capable at weak signal levels than anything i used to run.
i guess my question is does anyone actually use JS8Call regularly for more than just testing? ive heard people say the bands are pretty dead on it compared to FT8 but maybe im just looking at the wrong times or frequencies. also does anyone still do PSK31 anymore, i kind of miss that mode even though JS8Call is probably strictly better for what PSK31 was used for
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/8212-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actual-qsos-am-i-missing-something/Share on other sites