I've been comparing QSL methods for my DX contacts and wondering if anyone has done the math on bureau vs direct costs lately. The ARRL bureau rate is now $1.15 per ounce (about 10 cards) plus a $7 transaction fee, but direct mail overseas is getting expensive too.

For those still sending paper cards: What's your preferred method for regular DX contacts vs rare ones? I'm thinking bureau for common countries and direct for new DXCC entities, but curious about your experiences with success rates and timeframes.

Direct QSL method seems to be the most effective (63% success rate) compared to LoTW at 18% in my experience over 2 years. For rare DX I always go direct with green stamps and SASE. If you don't include return postage to a manager, you'll likely get your card back via bureau which takes months minimum.

I still use the bureau system for most DX cards. The bureau allows hams to exchange QSLs at a fraction of the cost of direct mail, though it can take years and the incoming bureaus may request funds to cover operating expenses. For special catches or DXpeditions, I'll spend the extra for direct mail to ensure I get the card.

Honestly, physical QSL cards have diminished greatly in the last 20 years due to time, post office visits, and costs. I've moved almost entirely to LoTW and eQSL, only sending paper cards for truly special contacts. Many hams send a card for first contact with a station for their collections but the digital systems handle 95% of my confirmations now.