-
which HT should i get as my first handheld - so many options its overwhelming
okay so i just passed my technician exam last month and im finally ready to actually buy something and get on the air. ive been doing a ton of reading and watching youtube videos but honestly i feel more confused now than when i started lol. everyone seems to have a really strong opinion about this stuff. the main ones i keep seeing come up are the Baofeng UV-5R which is like 25 bucks, then theres the Yaesu FT-60 which people seem to really love, and i also saw the Kenwood TH-D74 mentioned a few times but thats way more than i want to spend right now. i mostly want to hit the local repeaters and maybe do some APRS eventually if thats possible with a handheld. i dont really know what features actually matter vs which ones are just nice to have. like do i need dual band? does the number of memory channels actually matter that much for just starting out? someone at my local club meeting mentioned wires-x but i have no idea what that even is. anyway if anyone has a recommendation or just wants to share what they started with id really appreciate it, im trying to not make a bad first purchase here
-
first QRP build went better than expected, few questions though
congrats on the first build, that ohio contact is solid especially right now. the key click thing is almost certainly your rise and fall time on the keying waveform — if its clicking youre probably switching too fast. most homebrewers add a small RC network on the keying line to soften that up, like a resistor and cap that shapes how quickly the envelope comes up. theres a pretty good explanation of it in the ARRL handbook if you have one handy, or just search for QSK keying shaping and youll find what you need. on the 7805 question, yeah for portable work that linear regulator is basically throwing away voltage as heat which eats into your battery runtime. a buck converter module is honestly not that complicated to drop in, you can get adjustable ones for a couple bucks and most of them are pretty clean electrically though you might need to add some filtering if you notice any noise on receive. for home use i wouldnt bother but if you're running off a lipo or something in the field it makes a real difference over a few hours.
-
jumped into my first net last night and felt totally lost
so i finally worked up the nerve to check into a local 2m net last night. ive been licensed for about 3 months now (general class) and i mostly just listen but the net control sounded friendly so i figured why not. anyway i gave my callsign when they asked for check-ins and the net control came back to me and asked if i had any traffic or announcements and i just kind of froze up and said no and then didnt know if i was supposed to say over or out or what. i think i just said my callsign again and then nothing. felt pretty awkward. also when the net was wrapping up someone gave a long winded closing and i wasnt sure if i was supposed to acknowledge that or just let it go. i ended up keying up and just saying my callsign which probably wasnt right either. is there like a standard format most nets use? i know theres formal traffic nets with the NTS and stuff but this was just a casual weekly ragchew type net. wondering if anyone can walk me through what the flow is supposed to look like from a check-in's perspective
-
colinear vs yagi for 2m/70cm base station — worth the hassle?
so ive been running a diamond X50 colinear for a few years now on my back deck, works fine for hitting the local repeaters and doing some simplex with the guys in town. but lately ive been thinking about whether a yagi would be worth putting up, mainly for weak signal stuff on 2m ssb and maybe some tropo when conditions are decent. the thing is im not really sure if the gain difference is actually noticeable in practice or if its one of those things that looks good on paper but you dont really feel it day to day. the X50 is rated at like 6.5 dBd on 2m which is already pretty decent for an omni. a decent 5 or 6 element yagi would obviously beat that but then id lose the omnidirectional coverage which i kind of rely on for rag chewing and monitoring the local nets. anyone been through this decision? did you end up going with both and just switching between them? or is there some other setup im not thinking about. my mast situation isnt great so adding a second antenna is a bit of a project but not impossible.
-
is the amateur extra exam actually worth the effort or am i overthinking it
so ive been a general class for about two years now and people keep telling me to just go ahead and get my extra but honestly every time i look at the question pool i kind of freeze up. like the stuff about filters and transmission lines and all the impedance matching stuff... i took basic electronics in high school like 15 years ago and retained maybe none of it. i guess my actual question is whether the extra privileges are actually useful in practice or is it more of a vanity thing. i mostly operate HF, some 40 and 20 meter SSB, occasional digital. i know there are some extra-only segments but i honestly dont know how much activity is actually down there versus the general portions. also is the theory on the exam stuff you actually use or is it just memorize and forget kind of material
-
confused about what i can and cant transmit on as a tech license
i was in the same boat like a year ago and honestly just use the ARRL website, they have a chart that breaks down all the privileges by license class and its a million times easier than staring at part 97 subsections. the official rules are the rules obviously but for just figuring out where you can operate day to day the chart does the job fine
-
confused about how DXCC credits actually work — do I need QSLs for all of them?
so ive been chasing DX for about a year now and i keep hearing people talk about DXCC, WAS, WAZ and i think i have a decent idea what they are but the actual mechanics of getting the credits confirmed is where im totally lost. like i have like 40 something entities worked in my log but i have no idea what percentage of those are actually confirmed vs just worked. from what i understand you need either a physical QSL card or LoTW confirmation, is that right? and do paper QSLs still count for DXCC or has the ARRL basically moved everything to LoTW now? i sent out a bunch of cards through the bureau last spring and i dont think ive gotten a single one back yet. is that normal or did i do something wrong also is WAS separate from DXCC entirely, like do you apply for those separately and keep track of them in different logs or does something like HAMLOG or DXkeeper handle all of that automatically. sorry if this is a really basic question, i just feel like every time i look this up i get answers from 2009 and i cant tell whats still accurate
-
N1MM vs Log4OM for everyday logging + contests, worth switching?
I run Log4OM for day to day and still fire up N1MM just for contesting. Honestly thats probably the setup you want rather than trying to make one program do everything. Log4OM's WSJT-X integration is pretty solid, the UDP bridge works well and i havent had the dupe issue you're describing, at least not regularly. The interface takes some getting used to, theres a lot going on, but once you set it up its nice having your QSL tracking and awards chasing all in one place. As for migrating 8 years of N1MM logs, I did it with ADIF export and it went mostly fine. Lost some contest specific exchange data but for the basic QSO records it was clean. Wouldnt call it painless but it wasnt a disaster either. I'd just run them side by side for a while and see how you feel about it before committing to anything.
-
using a pi zero to automate my shack — anyone else gone down this rabbit hole
so i've been messing around with a raspberry pi zero w for a few months now and honestly i dont think i can go back to doing things manually. started out just wanting to log contacts automatically when i keyed up on my IC-7300 and it kind of snowballed from there. right now i have it pulling the freq and mode from the radio over USB using rigctld, writing to an ADIF log, checking the DX cluster via telnet, and flipping a couple relays to switch between my vertical and the dipole depending on what band im on. the relay board is just one of those cheap 4-channel SainSmart things from amazon, runs off the 3.3v GPIO no problem. the part that actually surprised me was how easy the serial comms were once i stopped fighting the baud rate settings. took me like two evenings to figure out that my USB hub was the problem, not the code. classic. anyway im curious if anyone else is running automation setups like this and what you're using. i looked at some of the dedicated logging software integrations but they felt like overkill for what i needed. also thought about an arduino mega for the relay stuff instead since the pi feels like a lot of compute just to flip some switches, but the wifi integration makes it so convenient for MQTT to my home assistant setup that i kept it on the pi. anyone run into issues with RF getting into the GPIO pins? i havent had a problem yet but im running 100w on 40m sometimes and the pi is sitting pretty close to the back of the radio on the desk.
-
RemoteHams setup with SDR backend — anyone else doing this?
yeah the corporate wifi thing is almost certainly their QoS hammering your UDP packets. voip and gaming traffic gets deprioritized a lot on managed enterprise networks and RCForb is basically indistinguishable from voip traffic as far as any layer 3 switch is concerned. i ran into the exact same thing trying to connect to my station from a hospital network — completely unusable. ended up just using my phone as a hotspot for anything serious on the Allstar + RemoteHams question i did this about 18 months ago. i used VB-Audio Virtual Cable on windows to route the SDR++ output into a virtual device and then pointed the Allstar chan_usbradio config at that same device as the receive audio source. it works but its finicky as hell, youll want to watch your audio levels carefully because virtual cable doesnt clip gracefully and youll get some nasty distortion going into Allstar if the SDR output is too hot. i had mine set about 6dB lower than i thought it needed to be and it was fine after that the feedback loop concern is real if youre planning on transmitting through the Allstar node and monitoring through the SDR at the same time but if theyre on different frequencies or youre just using the SDR as a panadapter and transmitting through a separate rig it should be fine
-
finally did the mars/cap mod on my 857d and some other stuff while i was in there
so ive been putting this off for like two years but finally cracked open the 857d last weekend to do the transmit mod and while i had it apart i figured id go ahead and do a few other things. the mars/cap mod itself is dead simple, just the one jumper on the logic board, took me longer to find my smallest screwdriver than to actually do it. but what i really wanted to talk about is the extended rx mod because i feel like nobody mentions that one enough. after doing both i was picking up stuff in the 108-137 range which is useful when im doing skywarn and want to monitor the air traffic in the area at the same time, not sure why yaesu doesnt just leave that open from the factory honestly. transmit wise i tested it on a dummy load and the power output below 1.8 and above 30 seems a little soft but thats expected i think, its not really designed to be flat across that whole range. also replaced the electrolytic caps on the PA board while i had it open, a couple of them looked a little bulgy to me and the radio is probably 12 years old at this point so figured why not. havent done a full alignment since i put it back together but its been working fine on all my usual stuff. anybody else done any other worthwhile mods on these? ive seen some stuff about the menu mod to unlock more options but im not sure if thats just a software unlock or if theres actual hardware behind it.
-
first time trying LEO satellites, completely lost on the doppler thing
FO-29 has been having some power issues lately so the transponder isnt always on during every pass, worth checking the AMSAT status page before you plan a session around it. AO-73 is generally more reliable lately from what ive seen. and yeah 7 minutes sounds like a lot until youre actually standing there trying to hold an arrow antenna and tune a radio at the same time lol. i still mess up passes i've been doing this like two years. the CAT control setup is worth the afternoon it takes to figure out, total game changer.
-
anyone going to the dayton hamvention swap meet area this year
yeah i go most years, the trick is getting there like right when the gates open on friday, seriously the good gear is gone by 9am. i grabbed a barely touched 817 a couple years back for 350 bucks and the guy next to me snagged a whole antenna tuner collection for almost nothing. parking in the yellow lots puts you closer to the flea market entrance but its a bit of a hike from the main building if you care about that. bring cash too, half the sellers dont do venmo or whatever
-
thinking about going for Amateur Extra, is the theory part as rough as people say?
i just passed mine like three weeks ago so this is fresh. the smith chart questions stressed me out way more than they should have tbh, but when it came to the actual test i only got maybe two or three questions that really made me think hard. a lot of it does come down to recognizing patterns from the question pool. that said i did go through the ARRL guide and read the theory sections properly because i figured if im gonna have the ticket i should at least understand what im doing. the band privileges are nice but i mainly wanted the Extra for the vanity callsign option which i know sounds dumb but thats the truth. already applied for a 1x2 and waiting to hear back.
-
confused about which HT to get as my first radio
congrats on passing the tech exam, that's the hard part done. okay so honestly for what you're describing the baofeng criticism is a bit overblown for a beginner. yeah they're not the cleanest radios in the world but for simplex and hitting local repeaters they work fine, ive seen plenty of people run them for years without issues. the main thing is just program it correctly and dont transmit on frequencies you shouldnt be on. that said if you can stretch your budget even a little the Yaesu FT-65 or the FT-4XR are genuinely nicer to use day to day. the menu system makes more sense, the audio is cleaner, and they feel more solid in the hand. i started on a baofeng and eventually got a yaesu and the difference was noticeable but not like night and day or anything. if $50 is what you have go baofeng and dont feel bad about it. if you have $90 get the yaesu and you probably wont feel the need to upgrade for a while. for APRS down the road you'd want something with a built in TNC eventually anyway so that's kind of a separate conversation
☀
Solar
SFI
128
SN
73
A
6
K
1
Quiet
X-Ray
C2.2
Wind
395.3 km/s
Aurora
2
Updated 22:30 UTC
HamQSL · N0NBH
Day
80/40m Fair 30/20m Good 17/15m Good 12/10m Fair
Night
80/40m Good 30/20m Good 17/15m Good 12/10m Poor
Callsign Lookup
_
Vanity Call Signs Available
Enter filters above and click Search.
ⓘ Callsign lookups are in real time via the FCC database.
Vanity callsign availability is refreshed daily at 6:00 AM CST.
The vanity search may be unavailable for a few minutes during this update.
Sarah Martinez
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited