Steven Wright
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Solutions
-
Steven Wright's post in thinking about taking the general exam, how hard is it really was marked as the answerso ive been a tech for about 8 months now and honestly i feel like im hitting a wall with just 2m and 70cm. i hear people talking on HF and it sounds so much more interesting, like actual conversations instead of just repeating my callsign into a repeater and waiting for someone to acknowledge me lol
anyway i downloaded the question pool from the arrl site and started going through it and some of it is way over my head. like the electrical stuff, ohms law i can kinda follow but then it gets into reactance and impedance and i lose track pretty fast. is the actual exam that brutal or does the question pool make it seem worse than it is? i feel like half the questions are things ill never actually use
also not sure how long i should study before trying to take it. took me about 3 weeks to pass my tech exam if that helps anyone gauge where im at
-
Steven Wright's post in finally caught a 10m opening yesterday — what's going on with the bands lately? was marked as the answeryeah 10m has been doing some really fun things lately, you kind of have to just be there when it happens which is the annoying part. the short answer on SFI is that once you start seeing numbers above like 150 or so, 10m gets a lot more likely especially on paths toward lower latitudes. closer to 180-200 and it can be open for hours and to all kinds of places. but honestly even at lower flux you can get sporadic-E openings that'll blow your mind, totally different mechanism though.
as for the cycle, we're actually doing pretty well right now, cycle 25 has been outperforming a lot of the early predictions. some folks think we havent hit the peak yet, others think we're close. either way enjoy it while its cooking because 10m during a good cycle is just something else compared to the low years. keep an eye on DXmaps or pskreporter and you'll start to get a feel for when paths are opening up before you even key down
-
Steven Wright's post in confused about DXCC vs WAS vs WAZ — which one should i even go for first was marked as the answerWAS is actually a great starting point for most people in the US, especially with that kind of setup. 100 watts and a dipole will get you all 50 states if you're patient, just takes time and picking the right band conditions. the contacts you already have in your log should absolutely count as long as you have a QSL card or a LoTW confirmation for each one — thats the key thing. ARRL accepts Logbook of the World confirmations now which makes it way easier than it used to be.
DXCC and WAZ are separate programs yes, and the mode endorsements are separate too so if you work 100 entities on phone that's your phone DXCC, 100 on CW is a separate endorsement etc. you dont need all three awards at once, most people focus on one and kind of passively accumulate credits for the others at the same time. i'd say get yourself set up on LoTW first if you havent already, that way every contact you make going forward is potentially counting toward multiple things at once. the ARRL website has the full rules for each program, a little dry to read but worth going through once
-
Steven Wright's post in finally did the TX mod on my 7300 — worth it or am i imagining things was marked as the answeryeah the tx expansion on that radio is pretty benign as mods go, its not like youre retuning finals or anything just unlocking what the hardware can already do. i wouldnt lose sleep over it.
one thing i'd actually suggest if you havent already is looking at the mic gain and compression settings in the menu rather than hardware mods — a lot of people run the 7300 with way too much compression and it sounds processed and harsh on the other end. spent an afternoon dialing mine in properly and got more compliments on audio than from anything physical i ever changed. not as satisfying as opening the box up but it does something
-
Steven Wright's post in confused about LoTW vs eQSL vs paper cards — which one do i actually need? was marked as the answeri was in the same boat a few months ago. i ended up just doing all three honestly — LoTW for anything serious, eQSL because some people only confirm there, and i ordered a batch of cards from one of those online printers to send out physically to anyone who sends me one. its kind of addicting once you start getting cards back in the mail ngl
one thing i'll add is Club Log is another one worth knowing about if you start chasing DX, some expeditions only upload there. just another thing to make an account for lol
-
Steven Wright's post in JS8Call vs just running FT8 for weak signal — am i missing something was marked as the answerso ive been running FT8 for about a year now and i get the appeal, the weak signal stuff is genuinely impressive, pulled contacts at -20dB that i never would have made on SSB. but lately ive been reading about JS8Call and people keep saying its better for actual communication vs just exchange-style contacts. i tried it for a few weeks and honestly the activity seemed way lower on the bands i checked (mostly 40m and 20m), like id see maybe 4-5 stations vs the wall of FT8 signals.
what im trying to figure out is whether its worth keeping JS8Call running alongside WSJT-X or if im just splitting attention for no real gain. i do some ARES stuff locally so the idea of a more robust weak signal chat mode is interesting but i cant tell if the activity is just low in my area or if the mode itself has kind of stalled out development wise. also does anyone run PSK31 still, i was reading old posts from like 2005 that made it sound like the best thing ever and i tried it once and the waterfall was basically empty
-
Steven Wright's post in when do you actually need to use phonetics vs just saying the letter normally was marked as the answerok so i just got my tech license a few months ago and ive been listening a lot on local repeaters before jumping on myself. i notice some people spell things out with like alpha bravo charlie and some people just say the letters normally. is there like a rule for when you use the nato phonetics vs just saying letters? or is it just personal preference
also i was on a net last week and the net control asked me to give my callsign phonetically and i kind of froze because i dont have them all memorized yet. like i know the common ones but some letters i just blank on. is that something that comes with time or do people write them down somewhere near the radio
-
Steven Wright's post in when do you actually ID on a net vs just checking in — confused about the rules was marked as the answeryeah that can be a little confusing at first, dont stress too much about it. the technical requirement is every 10 minutes AND at the end of your last transmission in an exchange — so if youre just doing quick back and forth on a net and its all happening within a few minutes you dont have to ID every single time. but a lot of nets have their own customs where they like you to lead with your callsign each time you key up just so the NCS and everyone else knows who they're hearing, especially on a busy repeater where signals arent always perfect.
the person who said "please ID" was probably just being a little overzealous or maybe your signal was dropping and they genuinely couldnt catch your call from earlier. i wouldnt take it personally. just make a habit of saying your call when you first key up each transmission and youll never have to worry about it honestly. its good practice anyway even if its not strictly required every time.
-
Steven Wright's post in Control Operator Responsibilities Under Part 97 - What Am I Actually Liable For? was marked as the answerAs a newly licensed General, I'm trying to understand my responsibilities as a control operator. Part 97 defines the control operator as an amateur designated to be responsible for transmissions from a station to assure compliance with FCC Rules.
But what does this mean practically? If someone uses my station and violates a rule, am I liable? What about remote operations or guest operators?
The rules mention local control, remote control, and automatic control - each requiring different approaches to achieve compliance. Can someone break down these control types and what my actual responsibilities are in each scenario?
-
Steven Wright's post in confused about where i can actually transmit on 40m as a general was marked as the answeri was in the same boat not long ago honestly. one thing that helped me was just listening for a while before transmitting anywhere. like i spent probably two weeks just tuning around 40m at different times of day and night and you start to get a feel for where the activity actually is vs what the chart says. the digital stuff especially kind of clusters on its own and its pretty obvious once you hear it.
the band edge thing tripped me up too. somebody on another forum explained it to me as -- your carrier might be at 7.298 but the voice audio is riding on top of that so the actual rf is spreading up from there. caught me off guard the first time i thought about it that way
-
Steven Wright's post in APRS digipeater path not working right — packets not getting out was marked as the answerthe SSID thing shouldn't matter for getting digipeated, that's more just for identification purposes. -9 is technically for mobile but it wont stop a digi from repeating you.
what i'd check first is your actual packet content — hook up a terminal or use a monitor mode on the TNC and look at exactly what youre putting out. sometimes the TM-D710 gets into a weird state where its transmitting but the packet data is garbage or malformed and the digis just drop it. i had this exact thing happen after a firmware glitch and spent like two days chasing my tail before i finally decoded what was actually coming out of the radio. pulled up APRSIS32 with a cheap RTL-SDR to monitor my own packets and immediately saw the issue — the path encoding was totally scrambled.
also double check your baud rate is 1200 not 9600, ive seen that catch people out more than once
-
Steven Wright's post in Control Operator Responsibilities Under Part 97 - What Am I Actually Liable For? was marked as the answerAs a newly licensed General, I'm trying to understand my responsibilities as a control operator. Part 97 defines the control operator as an amateur designated to be responsible for transmissions from a station to assure compliance with FCC Rules.
But what does this mean practically? If someone uses my station and violates a rule, am I liable? What about remote operations or guest operators?
The rules mention local control, remote control, and automatic control - each requiring different approaches to achieve compliance. Can someone break down these control types and what my actual responsibilities are in each scenario?