Everything posted by CW Whisperer
-
is the extra exam actually worth it or am i just overthinking this
so ive been a general for about two years now and i keep going back and forth on whether to bother with the extra. like i know you get the extra portions of HF and whatever but honestly i mostly just operate 20m and 40m ssb and i dont feel super limited right now. but then again i keep reading that you need it for some of the more advanced stuff and i guess the theory portion is actually interesting? idk my buddy told me the extra exam is way harder than the general and covers a bunch of stuff like filter design and transmission line theory and i forget what else. is that actually true or is it more like the general where you kind of just memorize the pool and take it. and does the extra actually open up anything useful for a casual hf operator or is it more for the serious contesters and dx guys genuinely not sure if i should just sit down and study or keep putting it off. anyone go through this recently
-
just starting out for tech exam, where do I even begin
so I've been wanting to get into ham radio for like two years now and I finally just decided to actually do it and sign up for the exam. problem is I have no idea how to study for this thing. I looked at the question pool online and honestly it's a little overwhelming, like there's so much there. a friend of mine said just memorize the answers without worrying about understanding them but that feels wrong to me, like what's the point of being a ham if I don't know what I'm doing anyway I've been looking at hamstudy.org which seems pretty good but I dunno if there's something better or if I should get an actual book. is the ARRL tech book worth buying or is it overkill for just the technician. also are there sections of the pool I should focus on more than others or is it all pretty evenly tested
-
confused about the callsign assignment process after passing my exam
so i passed my technician exam about two weeks ago and my callsign finally showed up in the FCC database yesterday. got a sequential call and its a 2x3 format in my district which is fine i guess, but now im seeing people talk about vanity calls and im kind of lost on the whole thing. like i understand you can apply for a specific callsign through the vanity process but i dont really get how it works. do you just pick whatever you want and hope nobody else wants it too? and is there a waiting period after you get your sequential call before you can apply or can you do it right away? i looked at the FCC ULS stuff and it was kind of overwhelming honestly. just want a shorter call or maybe one with my initials if thats even possible also does it cost anything? i thought i saw somewhere it used to cost money but not anymore but im not sure if that changed recently or what
-
first POTA activation didn't go quite how I planned but still had a blast
so i finally did my first parks on the air activation last weekend at a state park about 45 minutes from my house, K-4857 if anyone knows it, and yeah it was a bit of a mess but in a good way i think i brought way too much stuff, like i packed up my whole station basically, the KX2, a bunch of feedline, my big tripod, snacks for three days even though i was only going for maybe 3 hours, my wife thought i was moving in lol. set up a linked dipole on the tripod which took forever because i kept getting the legs tangled and then a family stopped to ask me what i was doing and i ended up spending 20 minutes explaining amateur radio to them which honestly was fun but yeah anyway i got on 40m around noon and started calling CQ POTA and within maybe 5 minutes i had a small pileup going which completely caught me off guard, i expected crickets honestly. ended up with 23 QSOs which i know is not a lot but for a first time out i was pretty happy. didn't make it to 10 which is the minimum for a valid activation so i switched to 20m and got 8 more there. logged everything on paper because i didnt trust myself to use an app while also trying to operate main question i have is about logging after the fact, do i just upload my ADIF to the POTA website directly or is there something else i need to do first? i converted my paper log to an ADIF using ham2adif and it looks right but i dont want to mess anything up
-
struggling to get past 5wpm on CW, any tips for actually building speed?
so ive been at this for about three months now and i feel like im completely stuck. started learning morse for my extra class but honestly i just got hooked on it and want to actually use it on the air someday. right now i can copy maybe 5wpm if everything is perfect and the guy sending is super clean, but anything faster and my brain just turns to mush. ive been using the LC Koch method on the LCWO website which seems fine but i dont know if im doing something wrong or just not practicing enough. i do maybe 20 minutes a day usually before work. read somewhere that you shouldnt practice more than like 30 mins at a stretch which i try to stick to. my character speed is set to 20wpm with farnsworth spacing which is what everyone says to do but man it still feels really slow going. is there like a point where it just clicks? i keep waiting for that moment people talk about where it stops being decode-one-letter-at-a-time and starts sounding like words. anyone been through this and come out the other side copying 20wpm comfortably?
-
first WWFF activation went better than expected, some questions though
so i finally did my first WWFF activation last weekend at a local nature reserve near me, KFF-1847 if anyone knows it, and honestly it went way smoother than i expected. set up my buddipole in a little clearing near the trailhead and started calling on 14.244 and got a decent little pileup going after about 20 minutes which surprised me. ended up with 47 QSOs before the rain started coming in and i had to pack up early. anyway i have some questions for people who do this regularly. first off, how strict are the rules about staying within the actual reference boundaries? i was pretty close to the edge of the park near the parking lot and i wasnt 100% sure if the lot itself counts or if you need to be inside the actual designated area. also do most people self-spot on the WWFF spotting network or wait for someone else to spot them? i felt weird self-spotting but i also noticed my rate really picked up after i finally did it. and one more thing -- for the log submission, do you just upload an ADIF like normal or is there a specific format they want? the website wasnt super clear to me on that part. thanks in advance, glad i finally got off the bench and tried this
-
Finally did the dual band install in the truck, few questions
yeah the door seal thing will eventually wear through the coax shield and you might start getting weird RFI or just straight up bad SWR readings and not know why. happened to a buddy of mine took him forever to figure out why his signal was so noisy. also on the mag mount thing — totally fine for getting started but if you ever notice any flutter or the mount sliding around at highway speeds just double check you have a good ground plane under it. on some trucks the roof has a liner underneath that creates kind of an air gap and it affects the ground. might be fine might not, depends on the spot you picked. welcome to mobile operating btw, it really does change things. i probably do 80 percent of my VHF/UHF operating from the truck now just during my normal commute
-
finally built my first QRP rig and took it out to the park — some thoughts
Ohio and Tennessee on 500mw is legit, dont undersell that. i remember my first QRP contact felt the same way, something clicks when you realize how little power you actually need most of the time. the antenna is doing way more work than the radio anyway which is kind of the whole lesson QRP teaches you pretty fast.
-
First HT recommendation for a new tech - overwhelmed by options
So I passed my tech exam last week (finally, been putting it off forever) and now im trying to figure out what HT to actually buy. I've been going down a rabbit hole on youtube and reading reviews and honestly it's made things more confusing not less. There's like a bajillion options at every price point and everyone has a strong opinion about all of them. My main use case is going to be hitting the local repeaters, maybe some simplex with a friend who also just got licensed, and eventually I want to get into APRS but I'm not sure if I need that built in or if I can do it another way. I'm not made of money but I'm not trying to buy the cheapest thing that'll break in a month either. Budget is probably somewhere in the $100-200 range, maybe a little more if something is really worth it. I keep seeing people mention the Baofeng UV-5R and I know it's like $25 but people seem kind of... mixed on it? And then there's Yaesu and Kenwood stuff that costs way more. Is the price difference actually worth it for someone just starting out or am I overthinking this?
-
finally trying to learn CW properly — keyer settings confusing me
im kind of in the same boat as you actually, been at it for about 4 months now. what helped me the most was just using the LCWO website every single day even if only for like 15 minutes. and honestly dont worry about copying everything on the air yet, just getting used to the rhythm of real QSOs is valuable even if you only catch call signs and signal reports at first. the rest starts to click eventually from what people tell me anyway
-
RemoteHams vs rolling your own remote setup — anyone actually compared these?
so ive been going back and forth on this for like two months now and cant decide. currently have a IC-7300 at my home QTH and i want to be able to run it from my office which is about 40 miles away. decent fiber at both ends so bandwidth isnt really the concern. ive looked at RemoteHams and the RCForb client software and it seems pretty solid for rig control and audio but im wondering if anyone has actually compared that against something like running your own VPN with flrig and a dedicated audio pipe. the RemoteHams SDR remote side of things also caught my eye — seems like you can access other peoples SDRs through the network which would be kind of cool for monitoring while youre in QSO from the remote end, like having a second set of ears on a different band. also the whole internet linking angle confuses me a bit. i know echolink and allstar are a thing but is any of that integrated into the RemoteHams ecosystem or is that totally separate. maybe im mixing things up. anyway if anyone has run this setup for more than just casual use id love to hear what actually breaks first because thats usually how you learn what matters
-
first real POTA activation yesterday, went better than expected
so i finally stopped saying i was gonna do it and just did it. drove out to the state park about 45 min from me, threw my end fed up in a pine tree, and ran 20w with the KX2 for about 2 hours. ended up with 32 contacts which i know isnt a lot but for my first time trying to do this for real i was pretty happy. 40m was kind of slow at first but then it just opened up and the pile was actually fun to work through. had one guy call me like 6 times even after i confirmed him, not sure what that was about. anyway my antenna situation was kind of a mess, i need a better throw line system cause i spent probably 20 minutes just trying to get the wire up in the tree
-
finally cracked a decent pileup last weekend, here's what worked for me
timing is absolutely the thing most people get wrong. ive worked enough rare ones to say with pretty high confidence that the guys consistently breaking pileups are doing exactly what you described -- not calling first, calling smart. there was a good writeup somewhere about how DX operators actually tune through a pileup and a lot of them start their listening pass slightly above the main crowd which is why going up 1-2 kHz often works better than sitting in the middle of the mess. the other thing that helps me a lot is tail-ending. when the DX comes back to someone, i listen to that exchange and the instant the other station sends his 73 or whatever, i drop my call in right there. you catch the op while his ear is already in that part of the band. works better on CW than phone imo because the timing is more precise. on SSB it feels a little more chaotic. your point about power is real. past a certain point youre just adding more noise to the pile. ive seen guys with kw linears and wire antennas get walked all over while a 100w station with a good yagi cuts through. its all about your signal quality relative to the noise floor on the other end, not just brute watts.
-
N1MM vs Log4OM for general logging + contest use, anyone running both?
so ive been using Log4OM for about two years now for everyday logging and i genuinely like it, the interface makes sense to me and the QSL manager stuff is decent. but every time contest season rolls around i feel like im fighting it a little bit. a buddy of mine keeps telling me to just switch to N1MM for contests and keep Log4OM for day to day stuff but that means running two separate logs and then trying to merge stuff later which sounds like a nightmare honestly. the other wrinkle is i run WSJT-X pretty regularly for FT8 and FT4, and right now i have that piped into Log4OM via the UDP stuff which mostly works but i've had it drop spots a few times and i cant always tell if its a WSJT-X thing or Log4OM thing. i tried exporting an ADIF and importing into N1MM once and it was kind of a mess, dupes everywhere and the timestamps were off for some reason. anyone actually running N1MM as their primary contest logger and then using something else for the rest of the time, and how do you handle keeping it all straight? or am i overthinking this and should just commit to one thing
-
confused about LoTW vs eQSL vs paper cards — what do most people actually use
ok so i just got my technician ticket a few months ago and ive been making contacts slowly, mostly on 2m but recently got on HF with a borrowed rig at a club meeting and made a few real DX contacts which was kind of mind blowing honestly. anyway everyone keeps talking about confirming contacts and i'm drowning in acronyms. LoTW, eQSL, paper QSLs through the bureau... i dont really understand how any of it works or which ones i actually need to bother with. from what i can tell LoTW is run by ARRL and is like the gold standard for awards but eQSL is easier to set up? and paper cards are apparently still a thing people actually mail to each other which seems kind of wild but also kind of cool. do i need all three or can i just pick one. also i heard you need some kind of certificate thing for LoTW which confused me even more. sorry if this is a dumb question i just dont want to miss out on confirming contacts i've already made
-
finally putting together a go-kit, what did I miss?
so ive been meaning to do this for like two years and after the storms we had last month I finally got off my butt and started building a proper go-kit. right now I have my FT-891 in a pelican case with a LiFePO4 battery (the 30ah bioenno one), a little solar panel, some coax, and my logbook. threw in a cheap handheld too just in case. thing is I keep reading that people forget stuff and only find out when they actually need it. anybody been deployed or activated for ARES or RACES and had one of those oh-no moments where something wasnt in the bag? im mostly thinking about local emcomm support, not like a full-on multi-day field deployment, but I want to be ready for that too eventually. also not sure how much antenna stuff to pack. right now I just have a roll-up jpole for 2m but wondering if I should add something for HF too since the 891 obviously does HF. the case is already getting heavy lol
-
raspberry pi controlling my antenna rotator — anyone done this?
the noise on the MCP3008 is pretty typical if you're running it off the pi's 3.3v rail — that rail is surprisingly dirty, especially if you have wifi active on the pi. a lot of people dont realize how much switching noise the onboard wifi throws around. try powering the MCP3008 from a separate regulated supply or at least put a 10uf electrolytic in parallel with that 0.1uf right at the chip's VDD pin. also make sure your AGND and DGND are tied together close to the chip, not somewhere else in the circuit. on the AC motor question, you're right that a standard H-bridge won't work. those G-series Yaesu rotators use a split-phase AC motor and the controller just switches the phase relationship to reverse direction. a relay board is actually the right approach there, you want DPDT relays to swap the motor leads. just make sure you debounce the switching logic in software and put a small delay between direction changes or you'll get some nasty current spikes. i did something similar with a G-800 and a pi zero a couple years back, worked fine once i sorted the noise issue. i ended up going with the arduino for the ADC side like you mentioned — just cleaner overall and the uno's 10-bit ADC is more than enough resolution for pointing an antenna.
-
confused about what i can and cant do with my technician license
okay so i just passed my technician exam like two weeks ago and ive been reading through part 97 trying to figure out what frequencies im actually allowed to use and its honestly kind of confusing. like i know i have HF privileges on 10 meters but i keep seeing stuff about phone vs CW vs data and i dont totally understand where those boundaries are. also someone at my club told me i can use 40 meters CW as a tech but only in a certain segment? i looked it up and i think thats true but i wasnt sure if that was current or old info. basically i just want to make sure im not accidentally transmitting somewhere im not supposed to be. is there like a simple breakdown somewhere that explains this without being a legal document
-
thinking about going for the extra class, is the theory part as hard as people say
so ive been a general for about two years now and i keep going back and forth on whether to bother with the extra. i mostly do HF, some 40m and 20m SSB, and honestly the general privileges have been enough for me so far but theres a few spots on 75m and the lower ends of 20 that i cant touch and it bugs me sometimes when i hear a good pile up going and im just sitting outside the edge. anyway the real question is the theory. i remember the general exam being not too bad once i actually sat down with the pool but people keep telling me the extra is a different animal. stuff like filter theory, transmission line calculations, the advanced operating stuff. i took some electronics courses back in college like 20 years ago so i still remember a little bit about reactance and impedance but honestly most of it is fuzzy. is it the kind of thing where you can just memorize the question pool and pass or do you actually have to understand the math to get through it also does the extra actually change your operating experience that much or is it mostly just the few extra khz here and there
-
band conditions have been crazy lately or is it just me
yeah the solar flux and K index thing trips a lot of people up at first. the A index is basically just a smoothed out version of the K index over 24 hours, so it gives you a better picture of whether conditions have been disturbed for a sustained period rather than just a snapshot. high A index (like above 20 or so) usually means the ionosphere is still recovering even if the K index has come back down. what really helped me understand it better was looking at the actual MUF predictions rather than just the raw numbers. I use VOACAP for longer planning and then for real-time stuff DXMaps is usually the first tab I open -- you can see actual spots and get a feel for what paths are open right now. pskreporter is great too if you run any digital modes because you can really see propagation in action. the thing is propagation is genuinely unpredictable in the short term even with good data. solar flux tells you about the potential but there are so many other factors, time of day, season, which specific path youre trying to work, whether theres any auroral activity. honestly after 20+ years im still surprised by it sometimes. just keep a log of conditions alongside your contacts and youll start to develop a feel for it specific to your location
-
confused about the vanity callsign process — when can I even apply?
yeah what he said, i went through this last year for my own vanity call. the thing that tripped me up was not realizing the call i wanted was still in that holding period so it just sat there as unavailable for a few months. was frustrating at the time but eventually cleared up and i got it no problem. just double check the status before you apply so you know what you're dealing with.
-
confused about part 97 and what i can and cant do on my technician license
okay so i got my tech ticket about two months ago and ive been reading through part 97 trying to figure out what im actually allowed to do and honestly its kind of a mess to understand. like i know i have HF privileges on 10 meters and some other bands but i cant figure out if theres like a wattage limit that applies specifically to me as a tech or if its the same as everyone else. and then theres all this stuff about third party traffic and what counts as broadcasting vs normal QSOs and i dont even know where to start with that. my elmer keeps saying just dont worry about it and get on the air but i feel like i should actually understand the rules before i start transmitting, you know? is there a plain english version of this somewhere or does everyone just kind of learn as they go
-
finally did my first real QSO yesterday, had to tell someone
oh man yes absolutely froze. i think i said my callsign wrong the first time and had to correct myself which made it worse. the other guy was super nice about it though, most hams are pretty patient with new folks. it gets way more natural after a few times, now i barely think about it. welcome to the hobby
-
SO2R Configuration Help - MK2R+ Audio Matrix Issues
Check your grounding scheme first - I've seen this behavior when the SO2R box doesn't have a solid RF ground reference. Also verify the firmware version on your MK2R+, there was a known bug in earlier versions that caused audio switching glitches under high RF conditions.
-
HackRF vs SDRplay RSP1A on VHF/UHF - Reality Check Needed
The HackRF is primarily designed as a hacker/experimenter platform, not an optimized receiver like the RSP1A. You're comparing apples to oranges - the RTL-SDR actually has decent sensitivity on VHF/UHF, while the HackRF trades RX performance for TX capability and wide bandwidth. For VHF/UHF monitoring, stick with the RTL-SDR or get an RSP1A.